Hero  Background Image

The Disability Access in Prison Education Project

The Disability Access in Prison Education Project

An international initiative dedicated to ensuring that incarcerated learners with disabilities receive equitable access to education.

This project brings together advocacy, training, research, and collaboration to create systemic change across carceral and educational institutions

Why This Work Matters

38-66

%

of incarcerated individuals identify as having a disability

Yet, most prisons and prison education providers lack the resources, accommodations, and training needed to support disabled learners.


From missing interpreters, inaccessible materials, and inaccessible education classrooms, to unjust disciplinary practices, the barriers are significant—and largely invisible.

Our project addresses these gaps through:

Firsthand lived experience

Legal and research-informed guidance

Presentations, technical assistance, and training manuals

Partnerships with prisons and colleges

We're always looking to grow this work


◉ Bring a training to your Dept. of Corrections, nonprofit, or university involved with prison education

◉ Collaborate on international research

◉ Get technical assistance on accessible education

Meeting
Meeting
Site Visits

Conduct in-depth walkthroughs of prison education programs to observe disability access

Cross-System Partnerships

Build sustainable bridges between Department of Corrections (DOC), disability service offices, and higher education institutions

Custom Resource Development

Create educational materials designed for low-literacy, Deaf, blind/low vision, and multiply-disabled learners

Research & Advocacy

Launch Internal Review Board approved studies and advise on policy for higher education in prison programs

Training & Awareness

Deliver customized trainings for corrections staff, educators, and administrators of all types of education within the correctional setting - including Department of Corrections (DOC) staff and teachers, college, university, and community organization educators and administrators, and college disability services professionals

Where We Work

We are currently active in 27 states and 3 international research collaborations.

[01] Site Visits & Direct Engagement

Washington, California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Alaska, Hawaii, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania

[01] Site Visits & Direct Engagement

Washington, California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Alaska, Hawaii, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania

[02] Other Pilot Sites

Missouri, Kansas, Wyoming, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon

[02] Other Pilot Sites

Missouri, Kansas, Wyoming, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon

[03] International Comparative Research

Belize, the United Kingdom, and Germany

[03] International Comparative Research

Belize, the United Kingdom, and Germany

Meet the team

Meet the Team

Ben

Wright

M.A., M.Ed., MFA, and Ph.D. Candidate

Ben

Wright

M.A., M.Ed., MFA, and Ph.D. Candidate

Dr. Jen

Montag, Ed.D.

Dr. Jen

Montag, Ed.D.

Project Highlights, Resources, and More!

people-having-fun-their-break-time
Photos & Stories
disabilityaccessinside.blogspot.com
people-having-fun-their-break-time
people-having-fun-their-break-time
Media & Resources
jkmresearch.weebly.com


Language Notes: Person-First and Identity-First 


Person-first language emphasizes the individual before any descriptors, reinforcing their humanity. This is especially important when referring to people who are incarcerated or justice-impacted. For example, we say “a person who is incarcerated” rather than “an inmate” or “a felon”. In systems that often dehumanize individuals based on carceral history, person-first language affirms humanity.


In the disability and accessibility space, person-first language has replaced outdated, negative terms. Instead of “wheelchair-bound”, we say, “a person using a wheelchair”. Other examples include “people with disabilities”, “a person who is deaf”, or “a person with autism”. This approach centers the person, not the condition.


However, language evolves with culture. As Disability Culture and Disability Justice movements grow, many individuals now embrace disability as a core part of their identity. This shift has led to the rise of identity-first language, where disability is not minimized but affirmed. Examples include “Deaf person”, “Blind person”, or “Autistic.” For many, this language reflects pride and self-definition.


Ultimately, respectful language means using the terms individuals prefer. If unsure, ask. When in doubt, begin with person-first language and adjust if someone indicates they prefer identity-first terms.


For more on inclusive language and outdated terms to avoid, explore these resources:

• Pratt Institute’s Inclusive Language

• TCDD People First

• APA Bias-Free Disability Language

Breaking down stigmas while building up futures for those with criminal records

Contact Us

Socials

© 2025 The Community

Our Community LTD dba The Community

501(c)(3) Nonprofit, EIN: 47-2343697

P.O. Box 100392, Milwaukee, WI 53210

Breaking down stigmas while building up futures for those with criminal records

Contact Us

Socials

© 2025 The Community

Our Community LTD dba The Community

501(c)(3) Nonprofit, EIN: 47-2343697

P.O. Box 100392, Milwaukee, WI 53210